Most of the
interchangeable lens cameras
we've seen to date seem to follow a standard mold: they have similarly
sized bodies, comparable designs and either an APS-C or Micro Four
Thirds
sensor at the core. But
recently, some manufacturers - namely, Nikon and Pentax - have begun
shrinking camera bodies in an attempt to make them even more appealing
to point-and-shoot users. The result: a smaller, lighter, more
fashionable ILC - that also happens to have an itsy bitsy image sensor. Sensor size, not
megapixel
rating, translates directly to image quality, but also lens and body
size, so you can either have an incredibly small body with an incredibly
small sensor, or a larger body with a larger sensor. Are you willing to pay a premium for the "world's smallest" interchangeable lens camera, even if it has the same size sensor
used in many point-and-shoot cams available for a fraction of the cost?
Pentax seems to think that you are - to the tune of $800.
The 12.4 megapixel
Pentax Q is tiny - it's so small, in fact, that you wouldn't be alone in mistaking it for a toy. There
is
a fully functional camera inside that petite magnesium alloy housing,
though it's admittedly not as powerful as you'd expect an $800 camera to
be. The pricey kit ships with an 8.5mm f/1.9 lens, and you can grow
your collection from Pentax's modest selection of Q-mount lenses, which
also happen to have laughably small focal lengths (a 3.2mm
fish eye, anyone?), due to the 1x2.3-inch backlit CMOS sensor's
massive 5.5x multiplication factor. So how does the Q fare when it
comes to performance and image quality? Jump past the break to find out.
Hardware
We would be doing the Pentax Q a disservice by not focusing on its adorably compact size, since, after all, that's by far its strongest
selling point. Measuring 3.9 x 2.3 x 1.2 inches, the Q is absurdly small - even advanced point-and-shoot cameras
like the Canon G12 tower over it. But despite its modest size, the
camera is still quite usable, with a handful of dedicated buttons
offering direct access to key settings, and a customizable front dial
launching a variety of creative modes.
The camera's rear is
dominated by a 460,000-dot, 3-inch LCD with a 100-percent field of view
and roughly 170-degree viewing angle. The display is recessed slightly,
so while you can see it fairly clearly when viewed from above or below,
some on-screen indicators may be blocked by the camera housing,
depending on the angle. The display is bright enough for use in
sunlight, and offers an adjustable color temperature - though you'll
want to take any adjustments made into account when previewing white
balance settings. Oddly enough, the live and playback images you'll see
on the display don't appear very sharp, despite its moderate resolution,
making it difficult to use the LCD to manually focus or verify
sharpness in playback mode.
To the right of the LCD, you'll find
exposure compensation, delete, ISO, info and menu buttons, along with a
five-position selector with dedicated buttons for flash mode, ISO,
shutter release timer, white balance and an OK button. Up top, there's a
flash release, playback and power buttons, and an elevated shutter
release. A front dial offers direct access to shooting modes, including
auto,
program, shutter-priority, aperture-priority, manual, Blur Control and
scene modes. An identically sized dial is positioned directly behind,
and serves multiple functions depending on the mode - in Blur Control,
for example, turning the dial to the right decreases the depth of field
(we'll revisit this later on).
There's an
SD card
slot on the right side of the camera and a battery slot on the left. A
micro-HDMI port and proprietary PC / AV connector are secured beneath a
protective rubber flap on the button, just to the left of the tripod
mount. As you'll find on any ILC, there's a tiny lens release button on
the front of the camera - pressing it lets you rotate an attached lens
counterclockwise for removal.
Like the Nikon J1, the Q includes a
clever retractable flash. Flipping the flash slider releases a
three-position arm, allowing the flash to rise above the lens for
unobstructed coverage, while reducing the amount of space it occupies
when docked to the left of the full-size hot shoe. Unlike the J1,
however, the Q's flash also functions while retracted, and you can tilt
it vertically as well - overall, it's a very impressive design.
Like any interchangeable lens camera, the Pentax Q is only as good as its glass, and the lens it ships with looks and feels like a
showroom
mockup. It's constructed of plastic, though it does employ a metal
mount. It's so lightweight, however, that you can toss it in your shirt
pocket and easily forget that it's there - that would be great if it
performed well, but unfortunately that isn't the case.
The Pentax
01 Standard Prime that ships in the box is just one of the five
lightweight plastic silver lenses that are compatible with the Q. The 02
Standard Zoom Lens ($300) includes a 27.5-83mm equivalent focal length
with an f/2.8-4.5 maximum aperture - it weighs just 3.39 ounces. The
03 Fish-Eye ($130) offers a 17.5mm equivalent focal length and a fixed
aperture of f/5.6, while the 04 Toy Lens Wide ($80) offers a 35mm
equivalent focal length with an f/7.1 fixed aperture. Looking to have
some fun while getting a bit closer to the action? The 05 Toy Lens
Telephoto (also $80) packs a 100mm equivalent focal length and an f/8
fixed aperture. That means three out of the five available lenses are
intended for casual shooting, though as you'll find after reading the
rest of this review, it's quite clear that the Q isn't destined for any
pro's kit.
Performance
Mediocre cameras don't carry $800 price tags, right? They cost $150, or
$99, or $39 in the "As Seen on TV" bin at your local pharmacy. When you
spend nearly a grand on a camera, you expect the very best, and we think
you should get it just the same. The Pentax Q is not the very best, however. It's small. It's cute. It's diminutive and light enough that a
child can likely hold it quite comfortably. But it is not the best. No, not even close.
There's
nothing impressive about the Q's performance. It's sluggish to boot and
focus, and while it offers a continuous shooting mode that captures up
to five frames per second, its buffer only support five continuous
captures - in other words, you can capture five frames per second, but
only for one second. There's also a 1.5 fps mode that lets you snap 100
consecutive images - both speeds support full resolution JPEGs,
though only the slower mode also allows for RAW capture. The Q's boot
speed is noticeably slow, taking five full seconds from power-on to
first image capture. Shooting a frame after the camera is already on can
take up to a second from the time you press the shutter release. In
other words, if you're trying to capture a photo in the moment, there's a
very good chance it'll be over before the camera even fires (see photo
below for an example).
We're also slightly perplexed by a few
issues we've had while trying to record video. The first is quite a
doozy - fairly often, pressing the shutter release in record mode will
simply cause the camera to lock up. A video file is created, but no
footage is captured. Pulling out the battery is the only option for
recovery, so if you happen upon a scene that you want to capture right
away, having a camera that occasionally fails is far from ideal. For
example, when "You Can Call Me Al" by Paul Simon was accidentally
blasting throughout the newsroom last week, our attempt to capture the
excitement was foiled by a Q that decided to get an early start on the
weekend, taking a long unapproved nap.
The second issue is also
quite significant, but can likely be fixed with a firmware update. Even
when holding it perfectly still, the camera appears to be
tracking
subjects that walk into the frame, resulting in the video to jump to
the left or right, as you can see in the clip below. And finally, the Q
doesn't begin recording audio immediately at the start of a clip. You
can correct this by cutting your clip in a video editor, but the first
second or so of each clip gets the silent treatment.
One of the
most frustrating performance issues with the Pentax Q is the camera's
absolutely pitiful battery life - worse than any cam we've used in
recent memory. During one day of shooting, the 940 mAh battery lasted
for fewer than two hours, allowing us to capture about 230 photos and
roughly five minutes of 720p video. It's lightweight enough to carry
around on a full day of touring, but if you tend to shoot more than a
couple photos every few minutes, 230 stills certainly won't cut it.
Image quality
When
reviewing images produced by the Q, there's nothing to indicate that
they were shot with an interchangeable lens camera. Everything in the
frame is in focus at f/1.9 - most of the time - though not
overwhelmingly sharp. Images shot at lower sensitivity settings (ISO
100-200) appear clean and free of noise, even in the shadows, while
noise becomes noticeable though not overpowering at ISO 500, likely due
to the camera's auto noise reduction feature, which compensates for
noise by reducing sharpness. The built-in flash is small, but reasonably
powerful - it was able to light our sizable workroom. The camera did a
fine job white balancing in bright daylight, but indoor shooting didn't
yield the same result - most images appeared with a slight yellow
tint. Images shot in low light were also often out of focus and
underexposed. Noise was even an issue outside, as you can see in the
image below, shot at ISO 500.
Advanced shooters will be relieved
to find that the Q does in fact shoot RAW, even taking its uncompressed
shooting abilities a step further, adding the unique option to save a
RAW version of the last captured image, even if you're shooting only
JPEGs. It won't work for high-speed continuous shooting, but if you
happen to snap a frame that you really don't want to lose, but failed to
properly adjust the exposure or white balance, you have the option to
save a buffered RAW version, essentially letting you step back in time
to right a wrong. We haven't found a need for this function during our
test shoots, but we can definitely see how it could come in handy at
some point. It's a clever addition either way - one that we'd love to
see other manufacturers adopt as well.
Shooting modes
The
Pentax Q includes auto, shutter- and aperture-priority, program and
manual modes, just like any other interchangeable lens camera. But it
also features a handful of scene modes - some typical, like macro and
Night Scene, but a few that we haven't seen before, like Forest, which
"enhances colors of trees and sunbeams through foliage and produces a
vivid color image." Hovering over each scene mode brings up a complete
description, though most graphics are quite accurate - a fork and
knife for the Food shooting mode, for example.
One of the effects
synonymous with DSLR shooting is shallow depth of field - crisp
subjects with smooth, creamy backgrounds. Despite the kit lens's f/1.9
aperture, however, the Q is quite limited when it comes to this feature,
due to its incredibly small sensor. Pentax has added a Blur Control
mode to help battle this issue, which contrary to its name doesn't
reduce blur, but instead increases the blur amount by capturing multiple
frames with different focus positions, compiling them into a single
image. You can use the rear "e-dial" to adjust the amount of blur. It
works fairly well, keeping your focal point sharp while blurring the
rest of the image, but advanced photographers won't have any issue
noticing that a digital filter was used.
User interface
For
one reason or another, manufacturers always seem to struggle with
system menus - even some of the most powerful (and most expensive)
DSLRs have frustrating menu layouts that leave you constantly searching
for obscure (and even some often-used) settings. The Pentax Q's
no-frills interface isn't pretty, but it's generally intuitive and easy
to use. The main system menu is arranged on a simple grid. You need only
navigate to the left or right to load a new page of settings (there are
a total of ten) - scrolling up and down lets you select only the
options already visible on the page. Most of the functions have
dedicated controls, as we've already outlined, so you should only need
to visit the main menu to adjust top-level settings.
The competition
So,
you've saved up your $800, and you're ready to buy a new
interchangeable lens camera. Do you take the plunge and pick up a tiny
Q? Do you opt for a much less expensive point-and-shoot camera with
image quality that rivals Pentax's ILC runt? Or do you put it all
towards a competitor's model that's not quite as slim, but will almost
certainly make up for what it gains in size with excellent performance?
If you need a camera to always have around, then you'll probably want to
opt for a point-and-shoot, but if you're set on adding a new mirrorless
cam to your collection, you're surely not without some top-notch
options.
Sony's NEX-C3 has been, and still remains, our first
choice in the mirrorless category. While still compact, it's
significantly larger than the Pentax Q, though its APS-C-size sensor
offers far superior image quality, shallow depth of field and improved
low-light performance. Oh, and it costs just $600. While a bit pricier
at $900, the Olympus PEN E-P3 remains our second choice, with a
top-notch focusing system and an attractive design. And if style's what
you're after, we were far from blown away by the Nikon J1's performance,
but it's hard to argue that the $600 ILC is ugly. Just don't get it in
white (or pink).
Wrap-up
Pentax really has managed to design the world's smallest interchangeable
lens camera - and yes, it does work. But there's no magic at play
here. The Q is small because all of its components were downsized -
Pentax took everything from the lens to the image sensor to the mode
dial and shutter release and gave them the shrink ray treatment.
Everything but the full-size hot shoe, LCD and SD card slot are
miniature versions of what you'll find on larger, more capable cameras.
The result is an attractive, pocketable ILC that doesn't quite follow
its powerful pedigree.
The Q is a very unique camera - one of a
kind, even - but that doesn't mean it's the one for you. If money is
no object and you're not keen on capturing incredible images and video
footage, then perhaps you'll still consider picking up a Q. As for the
rest of us - we're perfectly happy with our larger, much more capable
ILCs, and wouldn't dare consider making such a sacrifice just to carry a
bit less weight on our shoulder.
